Listed below is a compilation of state legislative and regulatory proposals that adopt the NAIC’s Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation (#275) (Annuity Suitability & Best Interest Standard) or fiduciary standard of care for annuity transactions.
ACLI staff will update this chart as new information becomes available.
|Alabama||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||ALA. Admin. Code R. 482-1-137-06||The ACLI & the AALIC submitted a letter to urge the Alabama Department of Insurance (DOI) to modify the Suitability in Annuity Transactions Regulation, Alabama Administrative Code Chapter 482-1-137, to incorporate the best interest revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation (Suitability Model), adopted by the NAIC earlier this year.||Proposal|
|Arkansas||Proposed Amended Rule 82||Would adopt the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation||054.00.82 ARK. CODE R. §§ 1 to 10||The Arkansas Department of Insurance proposed a rule to adopt the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation. The hearing was scheduled for October 22, 2020.||Active|
|Arizona||S. 1557||Adopts the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 20-1243.01 to 1243.06. 2010 NAIC Annuity Suitability Model adopted in 2017. 2006 model training requirements statute passed in 2017.||Introduced 2/3/2020|
Passed committee as amended 2/12/2020
Passed Senate 2/20/2020
Passed House committee 3/9/2020
Passed House 5/19/2020
Sent to Governor 5/26/2020
Signed by Governor 6/5/2020
|Delaware||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions changes to the NAIC Annuity Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||Title 18 : 1214 Suitability In Annuity Transactions||The ACLI prepared a draft of best interest amendments to existing annuity suitability regulation to incorporate the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation. The ACLI coordinated with NAIFA national and the DE NAIFA chapter to submit the draft to the Department. The Commissioner previously requested ACLI to draft the amendments and submit to his office for review prior to proposal.||Proposal|
|Idaho||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation with minor changes.||ID ST § 41-1940||Director Cameron has shared draft legislation to enact the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation. The Idaho Legislative Session is expected to convene January 11, 2021.||Proposal|
|Iowa||Adopted Best Interest Regulation||Implements the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.|
Effective January 1, 2021
|IOWA ADMIN. CODE r. 191-15.72 to 191.15.78||Proposed 3/24/2020 Comments due: 4/28/2020|
|Kentucky||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||806 KAR 12:120||In an NAIC Annuity Suitability Working Group video conference, ACLI learned that Kentucky plans to consider a rule this year.||Proposal|
|Michigan||H.6112||Would adopt Model definitions.||MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. §§ 500.4151 to 500.4165||Four bills were introduced on 8/17 that would modify current law to incorporate the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation. Each bill is tie-barred, which means that the bills must be passed as a package to become law.|
The Department is supportive of the measures. ACLI and industry will take the lead on pushing the legislation.
|Michigan||H.6113||Would adopt the Model best interest standard.||MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. §§ 500.4151 to 500.4165||See H. 6112||Active|
|Michigan||H.6114||Would adopt Model training requirements||MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. §§ 500.4151 to 500.4165||See H. 6112||Active|
|Michigan||H.6115||Would adopt the Model safe harbor||MICH. COMP. LAWS ANN. §§ 500.4151 to 500.4165||See H. 6112||Active|
|Nebraska||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||NE ST § 44-8106||The Nebraska Department of Insurance shared that they intend to introduce annuity suitability legislation in the 2021 Legislative Session assuming they have the backing of the |
|Nevada||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions changes to the NAIC Annuity Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||2006 NAIC Annuity Suitability Model adopted in 2006.||The Insurance Division has released an informal initial draft of proposed modifications to the Nevada annuity suitability regulations to incorporate the newest amendment to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation. The initial draft incorporates some of the recent revisions to the NAIC model but not the best interest language. Formal rulemaking has not yet begun.||Proposal|
|New Jersey||No text||Would adopt some of the most recent revisions changes to the NAIC Annuity Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||N.J. ADMIN. CODE §§ 11:4-59A. 2010 NAIC Annuity Suitability Model adopted in 2013.||ACLI is working closely with Prudential on developing a game plan to introduce the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transaction Model Regulation in NJ.|
ACLI is working on outreach to the Department of Banking and Insurance (DOBI).However, outreach to the DOBI has stalled due to COVID 19.
|North Dakota||No text||NDCC, 26.1-34.2-02||The ACLI is working closely with The Insurance Department and has prepared a draft regulation.||Proposal|
|Ohio||No text||OAC 3901-6-13||The ACLI submitted supportive comments to the Ohio Department of Insurance proposed updates to its 3901-6-13 Suitability Annuity Transactions rule. The states Director of Insurance, Jillian Froment, chaired the National Association of Insurance Commissioners Annuity Suitability Working Group while the working group crafted revisions to the NAICs Suitability In Annuity Transactions Model Regulation (#275). The Ohio proposal is similar to the model.|
The rule was posted for public review on October 8th. The comment period end date is October 23rd.
|Rhode Island||Proposed Rule 230-RICR-20-25-1||230 RI ADC 20-25-1.6||Comments to the Department of State were due by October 9th.|
ACLI submitted comments in favor of the proposal.
|Tennessee||No text||TENN. COMP. R. & REGS. 0870-01-86-.06||The ACLI has shared a draft with the Department of Commerce and Insurance, which is now reviewing the draft.||Proposal|
|Texas||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions changes to the NAIC Annuity Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||Title 7, Chapter 1115, Insurance Code||ACLI and the Texas Association of Life & Health Insurers are working on a draft bill to modify current Texas annuity suitability law to incorporate the newest amendments to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation.||Proposal|
|Wisconsin||No text||Would adopt the most recent revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation||W.S.A. 628.347||The ACLI and the Wisconsin Association of Life Insurers are working with the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance with the intent to develop a consensus draft for consideration.||Proposal|
|Connecticut||S.343||Would require a financial planner to disclose to a consumer, upon request, whether the financial planner has a fiduciary duty to such consumer for each recommendation that the financial planner makes to the consumer regarding insurance.|
Effective date: October 1, 2020
|CONN. AGENCIES REGS. §§ 38a-432A-1 to 38a-432A-8||Introduced 2/27/2020|
Passed committee 3/10/2020
Failed upon adjournment 5/6/2020
|Massachusetts||950 CMR 12.2.04+||Would establish a fiduciary duty of broker-dealers and prescribed requirements. Does not include life insurers.||950 CMR T. 950, Ch.12.200||Proposed 12/13/2019 |
|Nevada||No text||Would establish a fiduciary duty of broker- dealers and prescribed requirements.||NEV. ADMIN. CODE §§ 688A.400||The rule is still pending in the Secretary of State’s office which oversees securities.|
ACLI argues that this rule should not apply to annuities since the Insurance Commissioner has sole authority over those products. However, variable annuities appear to fall within the definition of a security in Nevada.
|New Jersey||Proposed Rule||Would establish a fiduciary duty of broker- dealers and prescribed requirements.||N.J.A.C. 13:47A-6.4 (Proposed Rule)||Governor Phil Murphy issued Executive Order 127 on April 14, extending certain administrative deadlines an additional 90 days. Included is a 90-day extension of the one-year expiration date of all proposed rules that were published in the New Jersey Register on or after April 15, 2019 which includes this rule.||Proposal|
|New York||Regulation 187||11 NYCRR 224.3||Adopted 5/17/2019||Complete|
|Receive points for||Points earned||How often you can earn these points|
|Creating profile picture||10||Once|
|Creating cover photo||10||Once|
|Updating profile information||10||Once|
|Commenting on a blog post||1||Forever|
|Publishing a new blog post||25||Forever|
|Sending a friendship request||1||Forever|
|Accepting a friendship request||3||Forever|
|Getting a friendship request accepted||2||Forever|
|Writing a public message on a group or publicly||1||Forever|
|Replying to a public message||1||Forever|
|Favoriting an activity stream item||1||Forever|
|Receiving a favorite on an activity stream item||2||Forever|
|Creating a group||15||Forever|
|Joining a group||1||Forever|
|Get promoted to group moderator/administrator||10||Forever|
|Promoting another group member to moderator/administrator||5||Forever|
|Visiting the main issues page||1||Once per week|
|Reading any issues page||3||Once per month|
|Adding an issue||25||Forever|
|Reviewing the bill tracker||3||Once per week|
|Reviewing an active bill||3||Once per month|
|Reviewing an inactive bill||3||Once|
|Reviewing the Member of Congress Tracker||3||Once per week|
|Checking on a Representative||3||Once per month per Representative|
|Checking on a Senator||3||Once per month per Senator|
Baltivists (Baltic activists) are Lithuanian-Americans, Latvian-Americans, Estonian-Americans, and friends who want to ensure the continued freedom of the Baltic countries. We are bipartisan and understand that our strong relationship with members of BOTH major political parties is key to continued independence. In the spirit of being one community, users who knowingly share false information or are disrespectful to other users on Baltivist.com will be removed.
Please join our community and help us keep the Baltics free!